Canadian Appeals Monitor Information and Commentary on Upcoming and Recent Appeal Court Decisions

Tag Archives: Ontario Court of Appeal

Ontario Court of Appeal Turns Against Cross-Border Securities Class Actions

Posted in Case Comments, Class Actions, Securities

The following post on the Canadian Class Actions Monitor blog may be of interest to readers of this blog: Ontario Court of Appeal Turns Against Cross-Border Securities Class Actions. In the recent decision of Kaynes v. BP, PLC, 2014 ONCA 580, the Ontario Court of Appeal stayed a proposed secondary market securities class action on… → Read More

Time to Leave: Supreme Court to Determine Securities Class Action Limitation Period

Posted in Case Comments, Class Actions, Securities

The Supreme Court of Canada has granted leave to appeal in a case that will determine how to apply the statutory limitation period for investors in Ontario who decide to sue public issuers and their executives under the Securities  Act.  Given similar legislation in other provinces, the case will be significant for investors and public… → Read More

Pay Me Now: Court of Appeal Delivers Lessons on fiduciary duties, the business judgment rule, and executive compensation

Posted in Case Comments, Corporate Law, Securities

The business judgment of directors setting executive compensation was front and centre in the Ontario Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Unique Broadband Systems, Inc. (Re), 2014 ONCA 538 (UBS). Although the decision is based on unique underlying facts, it offers several important lessons on corporate governance.

Summary Judgment on Trial: Ontario Court of Appeal Revisits the Risks of Summary Adjudication

Posted in Case Comments, Procedure

In a recent decision, Baywood Homes Partnership v. Haditaghi, 2014 ONCA 450, the Ontario Court of Appeal reiterates some of the risks of summary adjudication and reminds parties that, despite the enthusiasm for summary judgment endorsed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, summary judgment may not be appropriate… → Read More

The Importance of Borders in a Borderless World: Ontario Court Stays Action for U.S. Transportation Taxes

Posted in Case Comments, Class Actions, Conflict of Laws, Tax

In Prince v. ACE Aviation Holdings Inc., the Ontario Court of Appeal stayed a class action based on allegations that Air Canada had improperly collected transportation taxes levied under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). The Court’s decision highlights the difficulty in predicting the outcome of jurisdictional disputes involving e-commerce transactions. In addition, it… → Read More

Explain yourself! The Ontario Court of Appeal Reminds Us of the Importance of Reasons in Barbieri v. Mastronardi

Posted in Case Comments, Procedure

Overview Recently, the Ontario Court of Appeal reminded us of the importance of reasons for judgment in Barbieri v. Mastronardi. A unanimous Court allowed an appeal from an order granting summary judgment to a plaintiff who sued for breach of contract and negligence, holding that the lack of sufficient reasons in the motion judge’s endorsement… → Read More

Piercing the corporate veil may be easier than you think

Posted in Case Comments, Contracts, Corporate Law

How do corporate and personal liability intersect in a corporation that has only one officer, director and shareholder?  In the recent Shoppers Drug Mart v. 6470360 Canada Inc. case, the Court of Appeal helped to clarify when the person behind the corporation will be found liable. Background In October 2005, Shoppers Drug Mart (“Shoppers”) contracted… → Read More

The Final Word (Again?) On Limitation Periods for Securities Class Actions

Posted in Case Comments, Class Actions, Securities

The Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Green represents yet another plaintiff-friendly class action development from the Canadian courts, this time in the context of limitation periods.  Less than two years after its watershed decision in Timminco, Ontario’s highest court reversed itself and in a decision authored by Feldman J.A. re-cast the limitation period regime… → Read More

SHOTGUN! You should know this before triggering a buy-sell provision

Posted in Case Comments, Contracts

The following post on the Canadian M&A Perspectives blog may be of interest to readers of this blog: SHOTGUN! You should know this before triggering a buy-sell provision. On November 29, 2013, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in Western Larch Limited v. Di Poce Management Limited, 2013 ONCA 722 with important lessons… → Read More

Summary Judgment: Come One, Come All

Posted in Procedural Rights, Procedure

This article by Sarit Batner, Moya Graham and Brandon Kain may be of interest to readers of this blog: Summary Judgment: Come One, Come All The Supreme Court of Canada released two decisions today that will make summary judgment more widely available to parties. The reasons in Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7 and Bruno Appliance and Furniture,… → Read More

The Burden of Proof to Rectify a Contract: The Ordinary Civil Standard Applies

Posted in Case Comments, Contracts

The issue Rectification is an important equitable doctrine allowing courts to rewrite contracts that erroneously record the agreement reached by the parties.  The basic requirements for rectification are well settled.  Where there is a mutual mistake, the party seeking rectification must show (i) that the parties had a common continuing intention prior to the making… → Read More

When is a Quistclose trust not a Quistclose trust? When you call it a “debt”

Posted in Aboriginal, Bankruptcy and Debt, Case Comments, Contracts

In Ontario (Training, Colleges and Universities) v. Two Feathers Forest Products LP, 2013 ONCA 598, the Ontario Court of Appeal granted the appeal of an interim receiver, Pricewaterhousecoopers Inc., from a Superior Court of Justice decision where grant funds that were advanced by the respondent, Ontario’s Minister of Training Colleges and Universities (the “Ministry”), to… → Read More

The Second Opinion: Appeal Court Addresses Thorny Limitation Period Issues Regarding Anticipatory Breaches of Contract

A Commentary on Recent Legal Developments by the Opinions Group of McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Posted in The Second Opinion

When does the limitation period begin to run for an anticipatory breach of contract?  Does the limitation period commence as soon as the guilty party indicates that it will breach a future obligation?  Or can the innocent party safely assume that that the limitation period does not run until the time comes for the performance… → Read More

The Second Opinion: Appeal Court Clarifies the Contours of the Tort of Misfeasance in Public Office

A Commentary on Recent Legal Developments by the Opinions Group of McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Posted in The Second Opinion

Are policy decisions made by the government beyond the reach of the tort of abuse of public office?  A recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal provides a nuanced answer to this question. The pertinent facts of the decision in Trillium Power Wind Corporation v. Ontario (Natural Resources), 2013 ONCA 683 are as follows. … → Read More

Suspension Denied: ONCA Confirms that Automatic Stay Pending Appeal does not Suspend the Limitation Period

Posted in Bankruptcy and Debt, Case Comments, Procedure

The recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in msi Spergel Inc. v. I.F. Propco Holdings (Ontario) 36 Ltd., 2013 ONCA 550 (“msi Spergel”) confirms that the Court will not suspend, extend or otherwise vary the general two-year limitation period under the Limitations Act, 2002 (the “Limitations Act”) unless there is express statutory authority… → Read More

Court of Appeal to Revisit Overtime Class Action Certification

Posted in Case Comments, Class Actions, Labour and Employment

The Ontario Court of Appeal recently decided it will hear the appeal in Brown v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, the Divisional Court’s decision affirming Strathy J.’s denial of certification in a proposed “misclassification” overtime class action which we blogged about in the spring. The leave decision represents an unexpectedly quick return of overtime class… → Read More

The Second Opinion: Ontario Court of Appeal Decisions on Distracted Driving Could Hurt Development of Connected Cars

A Commentary on Recent Legal Developments by the Opinions Group of McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Posted in The Second Opinion

Last week was an exciting week for those who monitor developments in technology and the law. First, a Canadian telecom company announced it had struck a deal to introduce wireless internet service for Canadian cars. Then, the next day, the Ontario Court of Appeal released two companion decisions that added some oomph to Ontario’s distracted driving laws –… → Read More

Buyer & Seller Beware: Zoning Irregularities in Real Estate Transactions Across the Country

Posted in Case Comments, Construction and Real Estate, Contracts

In decisions recently released from the Ontario Court of Appeal and the British Columbia Court of Appeal, the courts identify which party bears the burden when zoning irregularities materialize following the close of a real estate transaction. In Lee v. 1435375 Ontario Ltd., the purchaser of a dry cleaning business was prohibited from relying upon… → Read More

The Second Opinion: Ontario Court of Appeal Rejects “Single Publication” Rule

A Commentary on Recent Legal Developments by the Opinions Group of McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Posted in The Second Opinion

Should identical defamatory articles, one published in a magazine and the other on the Internet, be treated differently for the purposes of limitation periods? Should each be treated as a separate libel, or do they both constitute a single libel? The Ontario Court of Appeal recently weighed in on these questions, leaving the former open,… → Read More

Court of Appeal Accepts Ontario Jurisdiction Despite Forum Selection Clause for Germany

Posted in Case Comments, Conflict of Laws, Contracts, Torts

During the spring of 2012, the Canadian Appeals Monitor posted a five-part series on the Supreme Court’s judgments in Van Breda, Black, and Éditions Écosociété (the “Van Breda Trilogy”). The Van Breda Trilogy was the Supreme Court’s long anticipated reformulation of the common law principles of private international law. Since the release of the Van Breda Trilogy,… → Read More

The Second Opinion: A Trap for the Unwary – The Ontario Court of Appeal Addresses the Limitation Period for Contractual Indemnification Claims

A Commentary on Recent Legal Developments by the Opinions Group of McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Posted in The Second Opinion

Imagine the following scenario. Party A contractually agrees to indemnify Party B against claims by third parties. Both Party A and Party B are then sued by Party C. Party B settles the claim with Party C and then seeks indemnification from Party A. Party A refuses to indemnify Party B. What limitation period applies… → Read More

A Little Less Above the Law? Crown Immunity in Lantheus Medical Imaging Inc. v. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.

Posted in Administrative, Case Comments, Manufacturing, Regulatory

Citing the “modern legislative trend” towards “putting the Crown on an equal footing with everyone else”, the Ontario Court of Appeal recently overturned an application judge’s granting of legal immunity to a Crown agent. The Appellate Court held that Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. (“AECL”), a federal Crown corporation and Crown agent, is not immune… → Read More

The Second Opinion: Absolute Privilege for Lawyers Not So Absolute

A Commentary on Recent Legal Developments by the Opinions Group of McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Posted in The Second Opinion

Amato v. Welsh, 2013 ONCA 258 marks an interesting development in the law – it suggests the previously inviolable doctrine of absolute privilege which protects lawyers from suit may admit an exception. The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the lower court, saying that it is possible that a court could find that the… → Read More