Canadian Appeals Monitor Information and Commentary on Upcoming and Recent Appeal Court Decisions

Tag Archives: disclosure

The duty to disclose Mary Carter agreements immediately: new guidance from the BC Court of Appeal

Posted in Case Comments

Mary Carter agreements are settlement agreements between a plaintiff and defendant in multiparty litigation wherein the defendant ostensibly remains an active party to the litigation while the plaintiff’s claim in fact targets the other parties. On September 5, 2017, the B.C. Court of Appeal (the “Court“) released its decision in Northwest Waste Solutions Inc. v. Super Save Disposal Inc., 2017 BCCA 312 affirming that Mary Carter agreements must be disclosed immediately and outlining potential remedies for a failure to make such disclosure. Parties and their counsel will need to keep this in mind when considering the merits … Continue Reading

This Week at the SCC (07/03/14)

A Commentary on Recent Legal Developments by the Opinions Group of McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Posted in The SCC Monitor

The Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to appeal this week in one case of interest to Canadian businesses.

In Springdale Pizza Depot Ltd. et al v. 2189205 Ontario Inc. et al, the Supreme Court of Canada  declined to grant leave to appeal from an Ontario Court of Appeal decision which addressed the availability of the right of set-off in the context of a statutory right of rescission in Ontario’s franchise legislation.

The McCarthy Tétrault Opinions Group consists of members of the firm’s litigation department whose practices focus on written advocacy and the provision of strategic advice and Continue Reading

Back to Basic: US Supreme Court to Hear Amgen and Clarify “Fraud-on-the-Market” Reliance Presumption in Class Actions

Posted in Case Previews, Class Actions, Corporate Law, Securities, Torts

The Supreme Court of the United States has announced it will hear the appeal in Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds, setting the stage for an important clarification of the use of the “fraud-on-the-market” reliance presumption in U.S. securities class actions. The Court first set out the presumption in its 1988 landmark decision in Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988). The Amgen decision will have an impact in Canada, where courts have grappled with the question of reliance in such cases. Generally, Canadian courts have been sceptical about importing a “fraud-on-the-market” approach, but … Continue Reading

Defence Contractor Appeals Disclosure of Contractual Information

Posted in Administrative, Case Comments, Intellectual Property

In a case that will be of interest to any parties involved in government procurement, Top Aces Consulting Inc. is appealing the decision of the Federal Court to permit the disclosure of pricing information pursuant to s. 44 of the Access to Information Act. Top Aces is an airborne training services contractor that had been awarded several contracts through a standing offer process at the Department of National Defence (DND). In October 2009, the DND received an access to information request for all standing offers and contracts awarded to Top Aces since 2003. This led to a judicial review … Continue Reading